Yangwang U7
Car comparison
Yangwang U7 2.0TvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
AMG C 43
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Yangwang U7 2.0T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Most powerful1,306 hp974 kW
- Highest torque1,680 Nm1,239 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight405 hp/t302 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score89/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43
- Lightest1,735 kg3,825 lb
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | YangwangU72.0T | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,306hp974kW | 421hp314kW |
| Torque | 1,680Nm1,239lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 3,223kg7,105lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Gross weight | 3,598kg7,932lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 26.3s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 38.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.6s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.2s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 405hp/t302kW/t184hp/1000 lb Calculated | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 521Nm/t349lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 717km446mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 5,360mm211in | 4,791mm189in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 1,824mm72in |
| Height | 1,515mm60in | 1,437mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,200mm126in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | - | 1,593mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 150mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | YangwangU72.0T | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.9 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.6 s | 12.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.8 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.2 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 231 km/h 144 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T | 1,306 hp 974 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | 421 hp 314 kW |
Yangwang U7 2.0T has 885 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43 and Yangwang U7 2.0T: 885 hp (660 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T | 1,680 Nm 1,239 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T | 3,223 kg 7,105 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T | 2.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | 4.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Yangwang U7 2.0T and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43: 1.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T | 405 hp/t 302 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T | 1,306 hp 974 kW | 2.9 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | 421 hp 314 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | YangwangU72.0T | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,306 hp 974 kW | 421 hp 314 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,680 Nm 1,239 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.9 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 3,223 kg 7,105 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 717 km 446 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 405 hp/t 302 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Yangwang U7 2.0T
- Has 885 hp more
- Has 1,180 Nm more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 163 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43
- Is 1,488 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























