Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220dvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
C 180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range872 km542 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,550kg3,417lb |
| Gross weight | 2,115kg4,663lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.6s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 872km542mi Calculated | 615km382mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,496cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,751mm187in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,437mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,613mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 41L | 40L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,400-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.6 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 170 hp 127 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 170 hp 127 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 872 km 542 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 615 km 382 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 872 km 542 mi | 615 km 382 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 257 km (160 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























