Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
C 180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque385 Nm284 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t134 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Lowest city consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 385Nm284lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,550kg3,417lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 615km382mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,606cc220cu in | 1,496cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,487mm177in | 4,751mm187in |
| Width | 1,720mm68in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,385mm55in | 1,437mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,497mm59in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,613mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 40L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000-4,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 170 hp 127 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 has 110 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: 110 hp (82 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180: 1.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 615 km 382 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Has 110 hp more
- Has 135 Nm more
- Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
- Has 70 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























