Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range707 km439 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best economy score91/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 156hp116kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.6s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 72.9s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.0s Calculated | 34.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 615km382mi Calculated | 707km439mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,496cc91cu in | 1,595cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,570mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 135g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 5,300 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.0 s | 34.7 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 170 hp 127 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 8.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 8.5 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 615 km 382 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 707 km 439 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.5 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 156 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 615 km 382 mi | 707 km 439 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 135 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























