Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W203) · Facelift 2004 C 350 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W203) · Facelift 2004
C 350 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful487 hp363 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight294 hp/t219 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score82/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 C 350 V6
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.0 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range633 km393 mi
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 487hp363kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 2,185kg4,817lb | 2,030kg4,475lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 41.3s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 61.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s Calculated | 18.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 294hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 184hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 550km342mi Calculated | 633km393mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,208cc379cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,707mm185in | 4,526mm178in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,728mm68in |
| Height | 1,433mm56in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,765mm109in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,493mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,464mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 C 350 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 18.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 208 km/h 129 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 487 hp 363 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 272 hp 203 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 has 215 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 C 350 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 C 350 V6 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8: 215 hp (160 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 4.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 C 350 V6: 2.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 C 350 V6 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 550 km 342 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 633 km 393 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 487 hp 363 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 487 hp 363 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 550 km 342 mi | 633 km 393 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 C 350 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8
- Has 215 hp more
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 2.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 110 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 C 350 V6
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 83 km (51 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























