Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
AMG C 63 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range805 km500 mi
- Best economy score85/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful487 hp363 kW
- Best power-to-weight294 hp/t219 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score82/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 487hp363kW | 476hp355kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,185kg4,817lb | 2,175kg4,795lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 41.3s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 35.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 294hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 290hp/t216kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 396Nm/t265lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 550km342mi Calculated | 805km500mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,208cc379cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,707mm185in | 4,756mm187in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,433mm56in | 1,426mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,765mm109in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,609mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,546mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 435L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 192g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 5,500-6,250 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 11.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 208 km/h 129 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 487 hp 363 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 has 11 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 4.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 4.1 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8: 3.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 550 km 342 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 805 km 500 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 487 hp 363 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 487 hp 363 kW | 476 hp 355 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 550 km 342 mi | 805 km 500 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 192 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 255 km (158 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























