Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W203) · Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W203) · Facelift 2004
AMG C 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful487 hp363 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight294 hp/t219 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range550 km342 mi
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score82/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.3 L/100 km13.6 mpg US16.3 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 487hp363kW | 367hp274kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 510Nm376lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | 2,185kg4,817lb | 2,115kg4,663lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 41.3s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 47.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 294hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 327Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 550km342mi Calculated | 521km324mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,208cc379cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,707mm185in | 4,611mm182in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,744mm69in |
| Height | 1,433mm56in | 1,412mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,765mm109in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,507mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,478mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 15.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 208 km/h 129 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 487 hp 363 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 has 120 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8: 120 hp (89 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 4.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 550 km 342 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 521 km 324 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 487 hp 363 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 487 hp 363 kW | 367 hp 274 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 550 km 342 mi | 521 km 324 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8
- Has 120 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 59 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























