Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997

AMG C 55 V8

347 hp5439 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan1998-2000
VS

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)

C 200d

163 hp1993 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    347 hp
    259 kW
  • Highest torque
    510 Nm
    376 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,570 kg
    3,461 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    221 hp/t
    165 kW/t
    4.5 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    70/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.7 L/100 km
    63.6 mpg US
    76.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    889 km
    552 mi
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d
Power
347hp259kW
163hp122kW
Torque
510Nm376lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,570kg3,461lb
1,650kg3,638lb
Gross weight
1,970kg4,343lb
2,350kg5,181lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
68.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.5s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
16.3s
Calculated
29.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.3s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.4s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton
Calculated
230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
530km329mi
Calculated
889km552mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,439cc332cu in
1,993cc122cu in
Length
4,516mm178in
4,751mm187in
Width
1,723mm68in
1,820mm72in
Height
1,387mm55in
1,437mm57in
Wheelbase
2,690mm106in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,509mm59in
1,601mm63in
Rear track
1,483mm58in
1,613mm64in
Trunk volume-
455L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
62L
40L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.3 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.5 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.3 s
29.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.0 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.4 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.4 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
182 km/h
113 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 has 184 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: 184 hp (137 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
510 Nm
376 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d
1,650 kg
3,638 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d: 2.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: 7.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
347 hp
259 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d
163 hp
122 kW
7.7 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,516 mm
177.8 in
Height
1,387 mm
54.6 in
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,437 mm
56.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
5.5 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d
Power
347 hp
259 kW
163 hp
122 kW
Torque
510 Nm
376 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.5 s
7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
1,650 kg
3,638 lb
Fuel consumption
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,516 mm
177.8 in
Height
1,387 mm
54.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,437 mm
56.6 in
Range score
530 km
329 mi
889 km
552 mi
Trunk score
-
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
Consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.47 LC100 km7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.95 LC100 mi12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,071 LC/year1,181 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8

  • Has 184 hp more
  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Is 80 kg lighter
  • Is 2.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 122 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d

  • Uses 7.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 359 km (223 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 55 V8
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 vs Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d - car comparison - FastVsFaster