Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250dvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 300h
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions104 g/km
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best economy score96/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d
- Fastest top speed247 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,125kg4,685lb | 2,195kg4,839lb |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.7s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated | 62.8s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.8s Calculated | 22.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 318Nm/t213lb-ft/ton Calculated | 305Nm/t204lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,136km706mi Calculated | 1,250km777mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,570mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 89mm4in | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 400L | 435L |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 116g/km | 104g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.8 s | 22.2 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 1,136 km 706 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 1,250 km 777 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.7 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.4 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h |
| 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,136 km 706 mi | 1,250 km 777 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 116 g/km | 104 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK | 4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.70 LC100 km | 7.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi | 11.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal | 600 L159 US gal132 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,155 LC/year | 1,050 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 114 km (71 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























