Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 300h
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best economy score96/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t134 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 385Nm284lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,195kg4,839lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 62.8s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 22.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 305Nm/t204lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,250km777mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,606cc220cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,487mm177in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,720mm68in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,385mm55in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,497mm59in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,570mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 435L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 104g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000-4,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 22.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 204 hp 152 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 has 76 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: 76 hp (57 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 6.4 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.4 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300h | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,250 km 777 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 104 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 600 L159 US gal132 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,050 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Has 76 hp more
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 55 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300h
- Has 115 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























