Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200dvsMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018 C 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018
C 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range889 km552 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200d
- Lightest1,555 kg3,428 lb
- Best power-to-weight103 hp/t77 kW/t9.7 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,555kg3,428lb |
| Gross weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | 2,125kg4,685lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 103.2s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.2s Calculated | 41.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 889km552mi Calculated | 872km542mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,993cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,405mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 88mm3in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.2 s | 41.7 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 160 hp 119 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d has 3 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 7.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200d: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 889 km 552 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 872 km 542 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW | 7.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.7 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 889 km 552 mi | 872 km 542 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 km (10 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200d
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























