Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200dvsMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205)
C 180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range889 km552 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 180
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 156hp116kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 104.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.2s Calculated | 42.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 889km552mi Calculated | 695km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,993cc122cu in | 1,595cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,405mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 89mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 400L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 135g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.2 s | 42.9 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 180.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 180 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 7.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 180: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 180: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 889 km 552 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 | 695 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW | 7.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.8 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 156 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 889 km 552 mi | 695 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 135 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 194 km (121 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 180
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























