Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 S V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205)
AMG C 63 S V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 S V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight296 hp/t220 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range742 km461 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,655 kg3,649 lb
- Best overall score82/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 487hp363kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Gross weight | 2,185kg4,817lb | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 41.3s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 47.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 294hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 296hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 406Nm/t272lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 550km342mi Calculated | 742km461mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,208cc379cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,707mm185in | 4,750mm187in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,877mm74in |
| Height | 1,433mm56in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,765mm109in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,636mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,592mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 209g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 S V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 5,500-6,250 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 12.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 11.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 208 km/h 129 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 487 hp 363 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 S V8 has 23 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 S V8: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 4.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 S V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 S V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 296 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 550 km 342 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 742 km 461 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 487 hp 363 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 S V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 296 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 487 hp 363 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 550 km 342 mi | 742 km 461 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 209 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 296 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 S V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 Performance Package V8
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 S V8
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 192 km (119 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























