Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200vsMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
C 220d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.6s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 78.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 31.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km354mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,993cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,755mm187in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,582mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 490L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,510L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 41L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 4,200 rpm | 1,800-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 31.5 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d has 16 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 7.8 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 569 km 354 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 354 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Is 330 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 145 km (90 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























