Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200vsSkoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain

C 200

204 hp1496 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2021-present
VS

Skoda Octavia IV Scout

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,567 kg
    3,455 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    128 hp/t
    95 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    640 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
Power
204hp152kW
200hp149kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,720kg3,792lb
1,567kg3,455lb
Gross weight
2,370kg5,225lb
-
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
To 99% top speed
74.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
64.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
29.9s
Calculated
28.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
658km409mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,496cc91cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,755mm187in
4,703mm185in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,829mm72in
Height
1,494mm59in
1,481mm58in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,686mm106in
Front track
1,584mm62in
-
Rear track
1,582mm62in
-
Trunk volume
490L
640L
Max trunk volume
1,510L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 2005,800-6,100 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm6,350 rpm
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI3,600-4,200 rpm1,750-3,500 rpm4,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.9 s
28.3 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
95 mph
157 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
204 hp
152 kW
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 has 4 hp more than Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
1,567 kg
3,455 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
231 km/h
144 mph
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
227 km/h
141 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 has more power, Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
204 hp
152 kW
7.5 s
231 km/h
144 mph
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.0 s
227 km/h
141 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,755 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
640 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,703 mm
185.2 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.0 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Lightness
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
1,567 kg
3,455 lb
Fuel consumption
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,755 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
640 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,703 mm
185.2 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in
Range score
658 km
409 mi
-
Trunk score
490 L
17.3 cu ft
640 L
22.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
Consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.30 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.40 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,995 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI

  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Is 153 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 150 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 vs Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster