Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200vsSkoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia IV Scout
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,567 kg3,455 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk640 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,567kg3,455lb |
| Gross weight | 2,370kg5,225lb | - |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 64.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.9s Calculated | 28.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 658km409mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,496cc91cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,755mm187in | 4,703mm185in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,829mm72in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,481mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,686mm106in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,582mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 640L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 5,800-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 3,600-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.9 s | 28.3 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 has 4 hp more than Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.5 s |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 7.0 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 has more power, Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 658 km 409 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 640 L 22.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 153 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























