Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220dvsSkoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia IV Scout
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Lightest1,567 kg3,455 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk640 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | 1,567kg3,455lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | - |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 64.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.5s Calculated | 28.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,993cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,755mm187in | 4,703mm185in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,829mm72in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,481mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,686mm106in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,582mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 640L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 4,200 rpm | 1,800-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 3,600-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.5 s | 28.3 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 7.8 s |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 640 L 22.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI
- Is 233 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























