Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 220d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range820 km510 mi
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | 2,370kg5,225lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 68.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.9s Calculated | 28.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 658km409mi Calculated | 820km510mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,496cc91cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,755mm187in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,582mm62in | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 480L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 132g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 5,800-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,400-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.9 s | 28.9 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 170 hp 127 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 has 34 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 7.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 658 km 409 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 820 km 510 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 658 km 409 mi | 820 km 510 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 132 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 162 km (101 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























