Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 200d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain

C 200

204 hp1496 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2021-present
VS

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018

C 200d

150 hp1950 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    231 km/h
    144 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    119 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
Power
204hp152kW
150hp112kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
360Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight
1,720kg3,792lb
1,510kg3,329lb
Gross weight
2,370kg5,225lb
2,165kg4,773lb
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
74.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
70.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
8.1s
0-200 km/h
29.9s
Calculated
33.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
658km409mi
Calculated
854km531mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,496cc91cu in
1,950cc119cu in
Length
4,755mm187in
4,686mm184in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,810mm71in
Height
1,494mm59in
1,442mm57in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,840mm112in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,582mm62in
-
Ground clearance-
92mm4in
Trunk volume
490L
-
Max trunk volume
1,510L
-
Doors
5
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
41L
CO2 emissions-
126g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200dPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 2005,800-6,100 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm6,350 rpm
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d-1,400-2,800 rpm3,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
8.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.9 s
33.8 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
95 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
204 hp
152 kW
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
150 hp
112 kW

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 has 54 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 54 hp (40 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
360 Nm
266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
1,510 kg
3,329 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
231 km/h
144 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 2007.5 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d8.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 2.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
658 km
409 mi
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
854 km
531 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
204 hp
152 kW
7.5 s
231 km/h
144 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
150 hp
112 kW
8.1 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,755 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
7.5 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
8.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
Fuel consumption
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,755 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in
Range score
658 km
409 mi
854 km
531 mi
CO2 score
-
126 g/km
Trunk score
490 L
17.3 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d
Consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.30 LC100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.40 LC100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,995 LC/year1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200

  • Has 54 hp more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 210 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 196 km (122 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
C 200d
C 180
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180
C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 220d
C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d
C 200
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d
C 200d
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200dvsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
C 200
CLA 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200vsMercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220d
C 200d
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
C 200
C 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6
C 200d
AMG C 36
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36
C 200
CLA 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200vsMercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 220d
C 200d
AMG C 43 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 vs Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 200d - car comparison - FastVsFaster