Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range707 km439 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 156hp116kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 2,370kg5,225lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 72.9s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.9s Calculated | 34.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 658km409mi Calculated | 707km439mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,496cc91cu in | 1,595cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,755mm187in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,582mm62in | 1,570mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 480L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 135g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 5,800-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 5,300 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.9 s | 34.7 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 has 48 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 48 hp (36 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 658 km 409 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 707 km 439 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.5 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 156 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 658 km 409 mi | 707 km 439 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 135 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Has 48 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Is 370 kg lighter
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 49 km (30 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























