Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8vsPorsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023
S 4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph
- Most powerful476 hp355 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,895 kg4,178 lb
- Best power-to-weight251 hp/t187 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score87/100
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range672 km417 mi
- Largest trunk554 L
- Best economy score71/100
- Best practicality score69/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 476hp355kW | 474hp353kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 90.7s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.3s Calculated | 18.3s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 251hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated | 216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 496km308mi Calculated | 672km417mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 3,996cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,728mm186in | 4,930mm194in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,354mm53in | 1,678mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,895mm114in |
| Front track | 1,683mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,686mm66in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 321L | 554L |
| Max trunk volume | 675L | 1,502L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.3 s | 18.3 s |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 196 km/h 122 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 474 hp 353 kW |
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 has 2 hp more than Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 273 km/h 170 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 3.9 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 and Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 496 km 308 mi |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 672 km 417 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 3.9 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 474 hp 353 kW | 4.7 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 |
| 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 |
| 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 476 hp 355 kW | 474 hp 353 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 496 km 308 mi | 672 km 417 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | 554 L 19.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 | Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK | 13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.68 LC100 km | 23.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.71 LC100 mi | 37.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal | 2,010 L531 US gal442 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,701 LC/year | 3,518 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 295 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 175 km (109 mi) more estimated range
- Has 233 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























