Porsche Cayenne II
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8vsPorsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023
S 4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed278 km/h173 mph
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest2,170 kg4,784 lb
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range739 km459 mi
- Largest trunk670 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 474hp353kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Gross weight | 2,880kg6,349lb | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.0s99% target: 275 km/h / 171 mph Calculated | 90.7s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 18.3s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t172kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 739km459mi Calculated | 672km417mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,806cc293cu in | 3,996cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,846mm191in | 4,930mm194in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,678mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,895mm114in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,669mm66in | - |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 670L | 554L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | 1,502L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 270g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 18.3 s |
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 474 hp 353 kW |
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 has 26 hp more than Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8 and Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 273 km/h 170 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 4.7 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 4.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 and Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 739 km 459 mi |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 672 km 417 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.7 s | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 474 hp 353 kW | 4.7 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 |
| 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 474 hp 353 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 739 km 459 mi | 672 km 417 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 270 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | 554 L 19.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 | Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 23.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 37.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 2,010 L531 US gal442 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 3,518 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 67 km (42 mi) more estimated range
- Has 116 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 S 4.0 V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























