Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) · Facelift 2017 4.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) · Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) · Facelift 2011
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed304 km/h189 mph
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight309 hp/t230 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions224 g/km
- Best estimated range677 km421 mi
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score81/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Most powerful507 hp378 kW
- Best overall score74/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 476hp355kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 610Nm450lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Top speed | 304 km/h 189 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.9s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph Calculated | 62.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.6s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 309hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated | 293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 409Nm/t274lb-ft/ton Calculated | 353Nm/t236lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 677km421mi Calculated | 550km342mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 6,208cc379cu in |
| Length | 4,544mm179in | - |
| Height | 1,287mm51in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | - |
| Front track | 1,684mm66in | - |
| Ground clearance | 96mm4in | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 224g/km | 280g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.6 s | 12.9 s |
| Top speed | 304 km/h 189 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 125 mph | 194 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 has 31 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: 31 hp (23 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 4.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 4.2 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 677 km 421 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 550 km 342 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.0 s | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 476 hp 355 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 304 km/h 189 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 677 km 421 mi | 550 km 342 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 224 g/km | 280 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 127 km (79 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 56 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Has 31 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























