Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) · Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
AMG C 63 S V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,655 kg3,649 lb
- Best power-to-weight308 hp/t230 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions195 g/km
- Best estimated range786 km488 mi
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 610Nm450lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 34.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 11.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 11.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 308hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 353Nm/t236lb-ft/ton Calculated | 423Nm/t283lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 550km342mi Calculated | 786km488mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,208cc379cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | - | 4,756mm187in |
| Width | - | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | - | 1,426mm56in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,609mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,546mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 435L |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 280g/km | 195g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 5,500-6,250 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 11.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 9.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 11.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 120 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 has 3 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 4.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: 3.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 550 km 342 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 786 km 488 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 550 km 342 mi | 786 km 488 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 280 g/km | 195 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 236 km (146 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 85 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























