Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)

AMG C 63 S V8

510 hp3982 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2018
VS

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997

AMG C 55 V8

347 hp5439 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan1998-2000

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    510 hp
    380 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    308 hp/t
    230 kW/t
    3.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.0 L/100 km
    21.4 mpg US
    25.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    786 km
    488 mi
  • Best overall score
    83/100
  • Best performance score
    87/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
Power
510hp380kW
347hp259kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
510Nm376lb-ft
Curb weight
1,655kg3,649lb
1,570kg3,461lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
1,970kg4,343lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
34.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.0s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
11.1s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.8s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.7s
Calculated
13.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
308hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb
Calculated
221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
423Nm/t283lb-ft/ton
Calculated
325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
786km488mi
Calculated
530km329mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
5,439cc332cu in
Length
4,756mm187in
4,516mm178in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,723mm68in
Height
1,426mm56in
1,387mm55in
Wheelbase
2,840mm112in
2,690mm106in
Front track
1,609mm63in
1,509mm59in
Rear track
1,546mm61in
1,483mm58in
Trunk volume
435L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
62L
CO2 emissions
195g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V85,500-6,250 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V85,500 rpm3,000-4,300 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.8 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.0 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.1 s
16.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.8 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.9 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.7 s
13.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
205 km/h
127 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 has 163 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8: 163 hp (122 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: 3.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
308 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
510 hp
380 kW
4.0 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
347 hp
259 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Length
4,756 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,516 mm
177.8 in
Height
1,387 mm
54.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
4.0 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
5.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
308 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
347 hp
259 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
510 Nm
376 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.0 s
5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,655 kg
3,649 lb
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Length
4,756 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,516 mm
177.8 in
Height
1,387 mm
54.6 in
Range score
786 km
488 mi
530 km
329 mi
CO2 score
195 g/km
-
Trunk score
435 L
15.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
308 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km20.47 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi32.95 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year3,071 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8

  • Has 163 hp more
  • Has 190 Nm more
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 87 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 256 km (159 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 55 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 vs Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster