Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8vsMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190)
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph
- Most powerful585 hp436 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight309 hp/t230 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range699 km434 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 585hp436kW | 462hp345kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 50.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 59.2s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.4s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.1s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.8s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 309hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 422Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 496km308mi Calculated | 699km434mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,728mm186in | 4,546mm179in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,939mm76in |
| Height | 1,354mm53in | 1,288mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,683mm66in | 1,680mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,686mm66in | 1,651mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 98mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 321L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 675L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 216g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.1 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.4 s | 11.9 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.1 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.2 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.8 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 215 km/h 134 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 585 hp 436 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 462 hp 345 kW |
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 has 123 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: 123 hp (92 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 304 km/h 189 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 3.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: 4.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 496 km 308 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 699 km 434 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 585 hp 436 kW | 3.2 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 462 hp 345 kW | 4.0 s | 304 km/h 189 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 |
| 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 3.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 585 hp 436 kW | 462 hp 345 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 304 km/h 189 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 496 km 308 mi | 699 km 434 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 216 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.68 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.71 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,701 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8
- Has 123 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8
- Is 280 kg lighter
- Uses 4.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 202 km (126 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























