Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 D4vsMercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177)
A 220
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S90 2.0 D4
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions123 g/km
- Best estimated range1,170 km727 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Lightest1,445 kg3,186 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 D4 | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,866kg4,114lb | 1,445kg3,186lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 60.6s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.6s Calculated | 24.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,170km727mi Calculated | 761km473mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,549mm179in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,796mm71in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,446mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,567mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | 104mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 420L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 123g/km | 153g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | - | 5,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 5,800 rpm | 1,600 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 D4 | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.6 s | 24.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 1,866 kg 4,114 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 8.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220 and Volvo S90 2.0 D4: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D4 and Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 1,170 km 727 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 761 km 473 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.0 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 D4 | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,866 kg 4,114 lb | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,170 km 727 mi | 761 km 473 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 123 g/km | 153 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 D4 | Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 D4
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 409 km (254 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
- Emits 30 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220
- Is 421 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























