Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
C 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range889 km552 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Lightest1,290 kg2,844 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,290kg2,844lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 68.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.0s Calculated | 29.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 717km445mi Calculated | 889km552mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,332cc81cu in | 1,993cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,549mm179in | 4,751mm187in |
| Width | 1,796mm71in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,446mm57in | 1,437mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,567mm62in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,613mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 104mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 43L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 138g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.0 s | 29.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 3.0 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 1,290 kg 2,844 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 8.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d and Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d and Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 717 km 445 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 889 km 552 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW | 7.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,290 kg 2,844 lb | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 717 km 445 mi | 889 km 552 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 138 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200
- Is 360 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 172 km (107 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























