Melkus RS2000
Car comparison
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i · Stage 3vsMelkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i · Stage 1vsMelkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i · Stage 2vsMelkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMelkus RS2000
1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)
Melkus RS2000
1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)
Melkus RS2000
1.8 VVTL-i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3) 383 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed288 km/h179 mph
- Most powerful383 hp286 kW
- Lightest950 kg2,094 lb
- Best power-to-weight404 hp/t301 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions220 g/km
- Largest trunk225 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score34/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3)383 hp | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)308 hp | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)338 hp | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i270 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 383hp286kW+113 hp | 308hp230kW+38 hp | 338hp252kW+68 hp | 270hp201kW |
| Curb weight | 950kg2,094lb | 950kg2,094lb | 950kg2,094lb | 950kg2,094lb |
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | 277 km/h 172 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 42.6s99% target: 285 km/h / 177 mph-11.7 s Calculated | 52.8s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph-1.5 s Calculated | 46.3s99% target: 274 km/h / 170 mph-8.0 s Calculated | 54.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s-1.0 s | 4.5s-0.4 s | 4.3s-0.6 s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.0s-4.5 s Calculated | 13.2s-2.3 s Calculated | 12.5s-3.0 s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s-0.9 s Calculated | 4.3s-0.3 s Calculated | 4.1s-0.6 s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s-1.2 s Calculated | 12.4s-0.5 s Calculated | 12.1s-0.8 s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 404hp/t301kW/t183hp/1000 lb Calculated | 324hp/t242kW/t147hp/1000 lb Calculated | 355hp/t265kW/t161hp/1000 lb Calculated | 284hp/t212kW/t129hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,800cc110cu in | 1,800cc110cu in | 1,800cc110cu in | 1,800cc110cu in |
| Length | 3,910mm154in | 3,910mm154in | 3,910mm154in | 3,910mm154in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,777mm70in | 1,777mm70in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,151mm45in | 1,151mm45in | 1,151mm45in | 1,151mm45in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 225L | 225L | 225L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| CO2 emissions | 220g/km | 220g/km | 220g/km | 220g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3) 383 hp: Power
- Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1) 308 hp: Power
- Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2) 338 hp: Power
- Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i 270 hp: Power
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3)383 hp | 7,800 rpm | - | 8,050 rpm |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)308 hp | 7,800 rpm | - | 8,050 rpm |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)338 hp | 7,800 rpm | - | 8,050 rpm |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i270 hp | 7,800 rpm | - | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3)383 hp | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)308 hp | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)338 hp | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i270 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.3 s | 4.1 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.5 s | 4.3 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.0 s | 13.2 s | 12.5 s | 15.5 s |
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | 277 km/h 172 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.6 s | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.2 s | 8.0 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 10.5 s | 10.3 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 12.4 s | 12.1 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 206 km/h 128 mph | 194 km/h 120 mph | 197 km/h 122 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3)383 hp | 383 hp 286 kW |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)308 hp | 308 hp 230 kW |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)338 hp | 338 hp 252 kW |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i270 hp | 270 hp 201 kW |
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3) 383 hp has 113 hp more than Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i 270 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i 270 hp and Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3) 383 hp: 113 hp (85 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3)383 hp | 950 kg 2,094 lb |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)308 hp | 950 kg 2,094 lb |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)338 hp | 950 kg 2,094 lb |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i270 hp | 950 kg 2,094 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3)383 hp | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)308 hp | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)338 hp | 277 km/h 172 mph |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i270 hp | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3)383 hp | 4.0 s |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)308 hp | 4.5 s |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)338 hp | 4.3 s |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i270 hp | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3) 383 hp and Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i 270 hp: 1.0 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2) 338 hp and Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1) 308 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3)383 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)308 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)338 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i270 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3)383 hp | 404 hp/t 301 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)308 hp | 324 hp/t 242 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)338 hp | 355 hp/t 265 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i270 hp | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3)383 hp | 383 hp 286 kW | 4.0 s | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)308 hp | 308 hp 230 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)338 hp | 338 hp 252 kW | 4.3 s | 277 km/h 172 mph |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i270 hp | 270 hp 201 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3)383 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)308 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)338 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i270 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3)383 hp |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)308 hp |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)338 hp |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i270 hp |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3) 383 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3)383 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)308 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)338 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i270 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3)383 hp | 404 hp/t 301 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)308 hp | 324 hp/t 242 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)338 hp | 355 hp/t 265 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i270 hp | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3)383 hp | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1)308 hp | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2)338 hp | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i270 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 383 hp 286 kW | 308 hp 230 kW | 338 hp 252 kW | 270 hp 201 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.5 s | 4.3 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | 277 km/h 172 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 950 kg 2,094 lb | 950 kg 2,094 lb | 950 kg 2,094 lb | 950 kg 2,094 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 220 g/km | 220 g/km | 220 g/km | 220 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 404 hp/t 301 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 324 hp/t 242 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 355 hp/t 265 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3) 383 hp | Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1) 308 hp | Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 2) 338 hp | Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i 270 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 3) 383 hp
- Has 76 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 80 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i (Stage 1) 308 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























