Melkus RS2000
Car comparison
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-ivsRenault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane III Coupe
RS Trophy 2.0 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful270 hp201 kW
- Lightest950 kg2,094 lb
- Best power-to-weight284 hp/t212 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score73/100
Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions190 g/km
- Largest trunk377 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score58/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 270hp201kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | - | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 950kg2,094lb | 1,387kg3,058lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,835kg4,045lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 54.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 82.9s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 22.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 284hp/t212kW/t129hp/1000 lb Calculated | 191hp/t142kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 732km455mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,800cc110cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,910mm154in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,848mm73in |
| Height | 1,151mm45in | 1,435mm56in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,636mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,545mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 377L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,024L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 220g/km | 190g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i: Power
- Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 7,800 rpm | - | 8,050 rpm |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 22.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 163 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 270 hp 201 kW |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 265 hp 198 kW |
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i has 5 hp more than Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V and Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i: 5 hp (4 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 950 kg 2,094 lb |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 4.9 s |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i and Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V and Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 270 hp 201 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.0 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 270 hp 201 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 950 kg 2,094 lb | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 732 km 455 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 220 g/km | 190 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 377 L 13.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i | Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 437 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 93 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 152 L more trunk volume
- Emits 30 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























