Car comparison

Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-ivsAUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Melkus RS2000

1.8 VVTL-i

270 hp1800 ccGasolineRWDManualSuperchargedCoupe2009-2012
VS

AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3)

3.2 FSI V6

265 hp3197 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2007-2011

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    270 hp
    201 kW
  • Lightest
    950 kg
    2,094 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    284 hp/t
    212 kW/t
    3.5 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    73/100

AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    214 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    455 L
  • Best economy score
    82/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-iAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
Power
270hp201kW
265hp198kW
Torque-
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
950kg2,094lb
1,540kg3,395lb
Gross weight-
2,040kg4,497lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
54.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
84.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
6.1s
0-200 km/h
15.4s
Calculated
22.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
5.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.9s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
284hp/t212kW/t129hp/1000 lb
Calculated
172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight-
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
714km444mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,800cc110cu in
3,197cc195cu in
Length
3,910mm154in
4,625mm182in
Width
1,777mm70in
1,854mm73in
Height
1,151mm45in
1,372mm54in
Wheelbase-
2,751mm108in
Front track-
1,590mm63in
Rear track-
1,577mm62in
Trunk volume
225L
455L
Max trunk volume-
829L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank-
65L
CO2 emissions
220g/km
214g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-iAUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6PowerTorque
  • Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i: Power
  • AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i7,800 rpm-8,050 rpm
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V66,500 rpm3,000-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-iAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
5.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
6.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.4 s
22.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.9 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.9 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
184 km/h
114 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i
270 hp
201 kW
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
265 hp
198 kW

Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i has 5 hp more than AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 and Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i: 5 hp (4 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i
950 kg
2,094 lb
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
1,540 kg
3,395 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i4.9 s
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V66.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i and AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 and Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i
284 hp/t
212 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i
270 hp
201 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
265 hp
198 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
225 L
7.9 cu ft
Length
3,910 mm
153.9 in
Height
1,151 mm
45.3 in
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,625 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,372 mm
54.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
4.9 s
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
6.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i
284 hp/t
212 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-iAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
Power
270 hp
201 kW
265 hp
198 kW
Torque
-
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
950 kg
2,094 lb
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
Fuel consumption
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
225 L
7.9 cu ft
Length
3,910 mm
153.9 in
Height
1,151 mm
45.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,625 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,372 mm
54.0 in
Range score
-
714 km
444 mi
CO2 score
220 g/km
214 g/km
Trunk score
225 L
7.9 cu ft
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
284 hp/t
212 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMelkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-iAUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6
Consumption9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.15 LC100 km15.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.60 LC100 mi25.63 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,573 LC/year2,389 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 590 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 112 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6

  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 230 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 6 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.8 VVTL-i
2.9
VS
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-ivsPorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
3.2 FSI V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6
1.8 VVTL-i
2.0 TFSI
VS
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-ivsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
3.2 FSI V6
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI
1.8 VVTL-i
2.0 TFSI
VS
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-ivsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
3.2 FSI V6
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA5 Coupe (F5)Facelift 201945 TFSI
1.8 VVTL-i
R 2.0 TSI
VS
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-ivsVolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
3.2 FSI V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6
1.8 VVTL-i
3.5 V6
VS
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-ivsLotusEvora3.5 V6
3.2 FSI V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6
1.8 VVTL-i
RS Trophy 2.0 16V
VS
MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-ivsRenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V
3.2 FSI V6
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TFSI
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i vs AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster