Melkus RS2000
Car comparison
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-ivsAUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) · Facelift 2011 3.0 TFSI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) · Facelift 2011
3.0 TFSI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest950 kg2,094 lb
- Best power-to-weight284 hp/t212 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score73/100
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 3.0 TFSI V6
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions190 g/km
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 270hp201kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | - | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 950kg2,094lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 78.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 20.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 284hp/t212kW/t129hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 753km468mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,800cc110cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 3,910mm154in | 4,626mm182in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,151mm45in | 1,372mm54in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,751mm108in |
| Front track | - | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,577mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 455L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 829L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | - | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | 220g/km | 190g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i: Power
- AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 3.0 TFSI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 7,800 rpm | - | 8,050 rpm |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6 | 4,780-6,500 rpm | 2,150-4,780 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 20.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 270 hp 201 kW |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6 | 272 hp 203 kW |
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 3.0 TFSI V6 has 2 hp more than Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i.
The biggest power difference is between Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i and AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 3.0 TFSI V6: 2 hp (1 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 950 kg 2,094 lb |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6 | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 4.9 s |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6 | 5.8 s |
Although AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 3.0 TFSI V6 has more power, Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i and AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 3.0 TFSI V6: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 3.0 TFSI V6 and Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6 | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 270 hp 201 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6 | 272 hp 203 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6 | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MelkusRS20001.8 VVTL-i | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 270 hp 201 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 950 kg 2,094 lb | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 753 km 468 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 220 g/km | 190 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i | AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 3.0 TFSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Melkus RS2000 1.8 VVTL-i
- Is 700 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 119 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 3.0 TFSI V6
- Has 2 hp more
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 230 L more trunk volume
- Emits 30 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























