Car comparison

McLaren 570S GT 3.8 V8vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

McLaren 570S

GT 3.8 V8

570 hp3799 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2015-2021
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Nismo 3.8 V6

600 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2016-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.8 s
  • Most powerful
    600 hp
    447 kW
  • Highest torque
    652 Nm
    481 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    315 L
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best performance score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

McLaren 570S GT 3.8 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    328 km/h
    204 mph
  • Lightest
    1,400 kg
    3,086 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    407 hp/t
    304 kW/t
    2.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.7 L/100 km
    22.0 mpg US
    26.4 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMcLaren570SGT 3.8 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
570hp425kW
600hp447kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
652Nm481lb-ft
Curb weight
1,400kg3,086lb
1,725kg3,803lb
Gross weight-
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
328 km/h
204 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
57.4s99% target: 325 km/h / 202 mph
Calculated
38.6s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.4s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
9.8s
7.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.2s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.1s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
407hp/t304kW/t185hp/1000 lb
Calculated
348hp/t259kW/t158hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
429Nm/t287lb-ft/ton
Calculated
378Nm/t253lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
627km390mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,799cc232cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,530mm178in
4,690mm185in
Width-
1,895mm75in
Height
1,200mm47in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,780mm109in
Front track-
1,590mm63in
Rear track-
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance-
105mm4in
Trunk volume
144L
315L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank-
74L
CO2 emissions
249g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

McLaren 570S GT 3.8 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • McLaren 570S GT 3.8 V8: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V87,500 rpm5,000-6,500 rpm8,500 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,600-5,600 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMcLaren570SGT 3.8 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.2 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.4 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.8 s
7.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
48.8 s
-
Top speed
328 km/h
204 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.9 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.3 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.4 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.1 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
213 km/h
132 mph
229 km/h
143 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8
570 hp
425 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 has 30 hp more than McLaren 570S GT 3.8 V8.

The biggest power difference is between McLaren 570S GT 3.8 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
652 Nm
481 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8
1,400 kg
3,086 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
1,725 kg
3,803 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8
328 km/h
204 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V83.4 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and McLaren 570S GT 3.8 V8: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between McLaren 570S GT 3.8 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8
407 hp/t
304 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
348 hp/t
259 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8
570 hp
425 kW
3.4 s
328 km/h
204 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
328 km/h
204 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
144 L
5.1 cu ft
Length
4,530 mm
178.3 in
Height
1,200 mm
47.2 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
328 km/h
204 mph
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

McLaren 570S GT 3.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
3.4 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8
407 hp/t
304 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
348 hp/t
259 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMcLaren570SGT 3.8 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
600 hp
447 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.4 s
2.8 s
Top speed
328 km/h
204 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,400 kg
3,086 lb
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
Fuel consumption
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
144 L
5.1 cu ft
Length
4,530 mm
178.3 in
Height
1,200 mm
47.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
-
627 km
390 mi
CO2 score
249 g/km
-
Trunk score
144 L
5.1 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
407 hp/t
304 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
348 hp/t
259 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMcLaren 570S GT 3.8 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
Consumption10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.72 LC100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.13 LC100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,809 LC/year3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

McLaren 570S GT 3.8 V8

  • Is 325 kg lighter
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 59 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Has 52 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 171 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
McLaren 570S GT 3.8 V8
Nissan GT-R (R35) Nismo 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GT 3.8 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8vsMcLaren570S Spider3.8 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
GT 3.8 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8vsMcLaren540C3.8 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
GT 3.8 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8vsMcLaren600LT3.8 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.9 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsFerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
GT 3.8 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8vsMcLarenGT4.0 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
5.2 V12
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsAston MartinDB115.2 V12
GT 3.8 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8vsMcLaren620R3.8 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
Turbo S Exclusive 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (991 II)Turbo S Exclusive 3.8
GT 3.8 V8
625C 3.8 V8
VS
McLaren570SGT 3.8 V8vsMcLaren650S Coupe625C 3.8 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
S 6.0 V12
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6vsAston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
McLaren 570S GT 3.8 V8 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster