Toyota Celica (T23)
Car comparison
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-SportvsMazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda RX-8
1.3 Wankel
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lightest1,215 kg2,679 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range655 km407 mi
- Largest trunk365 L
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score84/100
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Highest torque216 Nm159 lb-ft
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 180Nm133lb-ft | 216Nm159lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,215kg2,679lb | 1,373kg3,027lb |
| Gross weight | 1,565kg3,450lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 78.5s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.6s Calculated | 35.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 148Nm/t99lb-ft/ton Calculated | 157Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 655km407mi Calculated | 575km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,796cc110cu in | 1,308cc80cu in |
| Length | 4,335mm171in | 4,430mm174in |
| Width | 1,735mm68in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,315mm52in | 1,340mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,490mm59in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,480mm58in | 1,505mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 365L | 290L |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 267g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport: Power / Torque
- Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 7,800 rpm | 6,800 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 7,000 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.6 s | 35.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 192 hp 143 kW |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 192 hp 143 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 216 Nm 159 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 1,215 kg 2,679 lb |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 1,373 kg 3,027 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 7.4 s |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel and Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 655 km 407 mi |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 575 km 358 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.2 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft | 216 Nm 159 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,215 kg 2,679 lb | 1,373 kg 3,027 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 655 km 407 mi | 575 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 267 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
- Is 158 kg lighter
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 79 km (49 mi) more estimated range
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
- Has 36 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























