Car comparison

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSIvsMazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI TT Coupe (8J)

2.0 TFSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2006-2010
VS

Mazda RX-8

1.3 Wankel

192 hp1308 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,260 kg
    2,778 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    159 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.7 L/100 km
    22.0 mpg US
    26.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    183 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    714 km
    444 mi
  • Largest trunk
    290 L
  • Best overall score
    53/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSIMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Power
200hp149kW
192hp143kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
216Nm159lb-ft
Curb weight
1,260kg2,778lb
1,373kg3,027lb
Gross weight
1,660kg3,660lb
1,820kg4,012lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
80.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
78.5s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
26.7s
Calculated
35.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
157Nm/t105lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
714km444mi
Calculated
575km358mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,308cc80cu in
Length
4,178mm164in
4,430mm174in
Width
1,842mm73in
1,770mm70in
Height
1,352mm53in
1,340mm53in
Wheelbase
2,468mm97in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,572mm62in
1,500mm59in
Rear track
1,558mm61in
1,505mm59in
Ground clearance-
140mm6in
Trunk volume
290L
290L
Max trunk volume
700L
-
Doors
3
4
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
61L
CO2 emissions
183g/km
267g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSIMazda RX-8 1.3 WankelPowerTorque
  • AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI5,100-6,000 rpm1,800-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel7,000 rpm2,500 rpm7,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSIMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.7 s
35.1 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
200 hp
149 kW
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
192 hp
143 kW

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI has 8 hp more than Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel and AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
216 Nm
159 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
1,260 kg
2,778 lb
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
1,373 kg
3,027 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
240 km/h
149 mph
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI6.6 s
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel7.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 2.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
714 km
444 mi
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
575 km
358 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
200 hp
149 kW
6.6 s
240 km/h
149 mph
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
192 hp
143 kW
7.2 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,178 mm
164.5 in
Height
1,352 mm
53.2 in
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,430 mm
174.4 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.6 s
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSIMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Power
200 hp
149 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
216 Nm
159 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
7.2 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,260 kg
2,778 lb
1,373 kg
3,027 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,178 mm
164.5 in
Height
1,352 mm
53.2 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,430 mm
174.4 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Range score
714 km
444 mi
575 km
358 mi
CO2 score
183 g/km
267 g/km
Trunk score
290 L
10.2 cu ft
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSIMazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km18.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi29.85 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year2,783 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 64 Nm more
  • Is 113 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 139 km (86 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 84 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TFSI
1.8 T
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
2.0 16V TFSI
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsVolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
2.0 i 16V Type S
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsAcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TDI ultra
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra
1.3 Wankel
330Cd
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsBMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
2.5 i 20V T5
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsVolvoC302.5 i 20V T5
2.0 TFSI
1.8 T
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T
1.3 Wankel
3.0 V6
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsPeugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI vs Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel - car comparison - FastVsFaster