BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) · Facelift 2003 330CdvsMazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda RX-8
1.3 Wankel
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range955 km593 mi
- Largest trunk410 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
- Lightest1,373 kg3,027 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 216Nm159lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,373kg3,027lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.7s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 78.0s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.8s Calculated | 34.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 157Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 955km593mi Calculated | 575km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,308cc80cu in |
| Length | 4,488mm177in | 4,430mm174in |
| Width | 1,757mm69in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,369mm54in | 1,340mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,471mm58in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,505mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 290L |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 267g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd: Power / Torque
- Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 7,000 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.8 s | 34.9 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 204 hp 152 kW |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 192 hp 143 kW |
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd has 12 hp more than Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel and BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 216 Nm 159 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 1,373 kg 3,027 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 7.2 s |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 7.2 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 4.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 955 km 593 mi |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 575 km 358 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.2 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.2 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 216 Nm 159 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,373 kg 3,027 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 955 km 593 mi | 575 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 267 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd | Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 194 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 379 km (236 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
- Is 167 kg lighter
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























