Seat Ibiza IV SC
Car comparison
Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSIvsMazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda RX-8
1.3 Wankel
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest1,184 kg2,610 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range703 km437 mi
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score90/100
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Largest trunk290 L
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 216Nm159lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,184kg2,610lb | 1,373kg3,027lb |
| Gross weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 78.5s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.2s Calculated | 35.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 157Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 703km437mi Calculated | 575km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,390cc85cu in | 1,308cc80cu in |
| Length | 4,063mm160in | 4,430mm174in |
| Width | 1,693mm67in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,420mm56in | 1,340mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,469mm97in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,449mm57in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,441mm57in | 1,505mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 236L | 290L |
| Doors | 3 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 267g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 6,200 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 7,000 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.2 s | 35.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 192 hp 143 kW |
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel has 12 hp more than Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 216 Nm 159 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 1,184 kg 2,610 lb |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 1,373 kg 3,027 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 7.2 s |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 7.2 s |
Although Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel has more power, Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 4.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 703 km 437 mi |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 575 km 358 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.2 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 216 Nm 159 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,184 kg 2,610 lb | 1,373 kg 3,027 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 703 km 437 mi | 575 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 267 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 236 L 8.3 cu ft | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI | Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI
- Has 34 Nm more
- Is 189 kg lighter
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 128 km (79 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 54 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























