Volkswagen Tayron II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSIvsMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-80
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Lightest1,734 kg3,823 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk345 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,276 km793 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 254hp189kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,734kg3,823lb | 2,136kg4,709lb |
| Gross weight | 2,310kg5,093lb | 2,781kg6,131lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 99.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.1s Calculated | 40.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 674km419mi Calculated | 1,276km793mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 3,283cc200cu in |
| Length | 4,792mm189in | 4,995mm197in |
| Width | 1,866mm73in | 1,890mm74in |
| Height | 1,666mm66in | 1,710mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,790mm110in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,578mm62in | 1,645mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 170mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 345L | 258L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,090L | 1,971L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 74L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 3,750 rpm | 1,500-2,400 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.1 s | 40.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 254 hp 189 kW |
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI has 11 hp more than Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 2,136 kg 4,709 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 6.1 s |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 2.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 674 km 419 mi |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,276 km 793 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 254 hp 189 kW | 8.4 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 254 hp 189 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb | 2,136 kg 4,709 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 674 km 419 mi | 1,276 km 793 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 345 L 12.2 cu ft | 258 L 9.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI | Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI
- Has 11 hp more
- Is 402 kg lighter
- Is 2.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 87 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Has 150 Nm more
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 601 km (374 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























