Car comparison

Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI TurbovsSeat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-7

2.3 DISI Turbo

260 hp2261 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2007-2009
VS

Seat Altea Freetrack

2.0 FSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2007-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Lightest
    1,571 kg
    3,463 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.4 L/100 km
    25.0 mpg US
    30.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.8 L/100 km
    18.4 mpg US
    22.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    490 L
  • Best economy score
    82/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    676 km
    420 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurboSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
Power
260hp194kW
200hp149kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,740kg3,836lb
1,571kg3,463lb
Gross weight
2,301kg5,073lb
2,191kg4,830lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
214 km/h
133 mph
To 99% top speed
87.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
78.3s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
40.5s
Calculated
42.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
676km420mi
Calculated
638km397mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,261cc138cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,675mm184in
4,493mm177in
Width
1,870mm74in
1,788mm70in
Height
1,645mm65in
1,622mm64in
Wheelbase
2,750mm108in
2,576mm101in
Front track
1,615mm64in
1,542mm61in
Rear track
1,610mm63in
1,527mm60in
Trunk volume
455L
490L
Max trunk volume
774L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI TurboSeat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSIPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo5,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI5,700 rpm3,500 rpm5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurboSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.5 s
42.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
214 km/h
133 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
260 hp
194 kW
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
200 hp
149 kW

Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo has 60 hp more than Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI and Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: 60 hp (45 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
1,571 kg
3,463 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
214 km/h
133 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo8.0 s
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI7.5 s

Although Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo has more power, Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI and Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI and Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
676 km
420 mi
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
638 km
397 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
260 hp
194 kW
8.0 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.5 s
214 km/h
133 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,675 mm
184.1 in
Height
1,645 mm
64.8 in
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,493 mm
176.9 in
Height
1,622 mm
63.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
8.0 s
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurboSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
Power
260 hp
194 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Lightness
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,571 kg
3,463 lb
Fuel consumption
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,675 mm
184.1 in
Height
1,645 mm
64.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,493 mm
176.9 in
Height
1,622 mm
63.9 in
Range score
676 km
420 mi
638 km
397 mi
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-7 2.3 DISI TurboSeat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI
Consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.85 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.73 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,678 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo

  • Has 60 hp more
  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 38 km (24 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI

  • Is 169 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 35 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.3 DISI Turbo
3.5
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsNissanMurano II (Z51)3.5
2.0 FSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSIvsSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
2.3 DISI Turbo
3.0si
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsBMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si
2.0 FSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSIvsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
2.3 DISI Turbo
3.0si
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsBMWX5 (E70)3.0si
2.0 FSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
2.3 DISI Turbo
GLK 280 V6
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
2.0 FSI
23d
VS
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSIvsBMWX1 (E84)23d
2.3 DISI Turbo
3.5 V6
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsNissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
2.0 FSI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
VS
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSIvsMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 FSI
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSIvsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
2.3 DISI Turbo
28i
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsBMWX3 (F25)28i
Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo vs Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster