BMW X3 (F25)
Car comparison
BMW X3 (F25) 28ivsMazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-7
2.3 DISI Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (F25) 28i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range744 km463 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,740 kg3,836 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX3 (F25)28i | MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Gross weight | 2,305kg5,082lb | 2,301kg5,073lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 87.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.7s Calculated | 40.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 744km463mi Calculated | 676km420mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 2,261cc138cu in |
| Length | 4,648mm183in | 4,675mm184in |
| Width | 1,881mm74in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,645mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,750mm108in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,632mm64in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 455L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 774L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 69L |
| CO2 emissions | 210g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X3 (F25) 28i: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 6,600 rpm | 2,600-3,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX3 (F25)28i | MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.7 s | 40.5 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 258 hp 192 kW |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 260 hp 194 kW |
Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo has 2 hp more than BMW X3 (F25) 28i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 28i and Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 6.9 s |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 8.0 s |
Although Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo has more power, BMW X3 (F25) 28i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 28i and Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 28i and Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 744 km 463 mi |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 676 km 420 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 260 hp 194 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (F25) 28i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX3 (F25)28i | MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 744 km 463 mi | 676 km 420 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 210 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X3 (F25) 28i | Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X3 (F25) 28i
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 68 km (42 mi) more estimated range
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























