Car comparison

BMW X1 (E84) 28ivsMazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (E84)

28i

258 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2009-2011
VS

Mazda CX-7

2.3 DISI Turbo

260 hp2261 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2007-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X1 (E84) 28i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,610 kg
    3,549 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    160 hp/t
    119 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.4 L/100 km
    25.0 mpg US
    30.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.0 L/100 km
    18.1 mpg US
    21.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo

  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    676 km
    420 mi
  • Largest trunk
    455 L
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (E84)28iMazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
Power
258hp192kW
260hp194kW
Torque
310Nm229lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,610kg3,549lb
1,740kg3,836lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
2,301kg5,073lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
75.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
87.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
26.1s
Calculated
40.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
7.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
670km416mi
Calculated
676km420mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,996cc183cu in
2,261cc138cu in
Length
4,454mm175in
4,675mm184in
Width
1,789mm70in
1,870mm74in
Height
1,545mm61in
1,645mm65in
Wheelbase
2,760mm109in
2,750mm108in
Front track
1,500mm59in
1,615mm64in
Rear track
1,529mm60in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance
194mm8in
-
Trunk volume
420L
455L
Max trunk volume
1,350L
774L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
69L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (E84) 28iMazda CX-7 2.3 DISI TurboPowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (E84) 28i: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (E84)28i6,600 rpm2,600-3,000 rpm6,850 rpm
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo5,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (E84)28iMazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
7.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.1 s
40.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i
258 hp
192 kW
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
260 hp
194 kW

Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo has 2 hp more than BMW X1 (E84) 28i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 28i and Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i
310 Nm
229 lb-ft
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
1,740 kg
3,836 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i6.8 s
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo8.0 s

Although Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo has more power, BMW X1 (E84) 28i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 28i and Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 28i and Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i
670 km
416 mi
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
676 km
420 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (E84)28i
258 hp
192 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
260 hp
194 kW
8.0 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (E84)28i
Power
258 hp
192 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,454 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,545 mm
60.8 in
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,675 mm
184.1 in
Height
1,645 mm
64.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (E84)28i
Power
258 hp
192 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK

BMW X1 (E84) 28i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (E84)28i
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
6.8 s
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (E84)28i
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (E84)28iMazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
Power
258 hp
192 kW
260 hp
194 kW
Torque
310 Nm
229 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
Fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,454 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,545 mm
60.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,675 mm
184.1 in
Height
1,645 mm
64.8 in
Range score
670 km
416 mi
676 km
420 mi
Trunk score
420 L
14.8 cu ft
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (E84) 28iMazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo
Consumption9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.45 LC100 km17.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.47 LC100 mi28.73 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,468 LC/year2,678 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (E84) 28i

  • Is 130 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Has 6 km (4 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 35 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (E84) 28i
Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

28i
28i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)28ivsBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
2.3 DISI Turbo
3.5
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsNissanMurano II (Z51)3.5
28i
25i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)28ivsBMWX1 (F48)25i
2.3 DISI Turbo
3.0si
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsBMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si
28i
23i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)28ivsBMWX1 (U11)23i
2.3 DISI Turbo
3.0si
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsBMWX5 (E70)3.0si
28i
28i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)28ivsBMWX3 (F25)28i
2.3 DISI Turbo
GLK 280 V6
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
2.3 DISI Turbo
3.5 V6
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsNissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
2.3 DISI Turbo
3.2 FSI V6
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
28i
35i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)28ivsBMWX6 (E71)35i
28i
35i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)28ivsBMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i
BMW X1 (E84) 28i vs Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster