Skoda Karoq · Facelift 2021
Car comparison
Skoda Karoq · Facelift 2021 2.0 TDIvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-30
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.6 L/100 km65.3 mpg US78.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,163 km723 mi
- Largest trunk521 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
- Lightest1,407 kg3,102 lb
- Best power-to-weight107 hp/t79 kW/t9.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 213Nm157lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,630kg3,594lb | 1,407kg3,102lb |
| Gross weight | 2,005kg4,420lb | 1,927kg4,248lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 77.1s99% target: 196 km/h / 122 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 56.1s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 92hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 151Nm/t101lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,163km723mi Calculated | 981km609mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,384mm173in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,629mm64in | 1,540mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,655mm105in |
| Front track | 1,576mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 521L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,630L | 1,406L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 113g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | - | 1,600-3,000 rpm | 3,250 rpm |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 6,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 56.1 s | - |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 87 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 213 Nm 157 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 1,407 kg 3,102 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 198 km/h 123 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 8.8 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 8.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 92 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.9 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 1,163 km 723 mi |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 981 km 609 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 198 km/h 123 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 92 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.9 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 213 Nm 157 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | 1,407 kg 3,102 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,163 km 723 mi | 981 km 609 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 113 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 92 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.9 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI | Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.52 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,129 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI
- Has 127 Nm more
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 182 km (113 mi) more estimated range
- Has 91 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
- Is 223 kg lighter
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























