Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0vsMazda CX-3 2.0i

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper D 2.0

150 hp1995 ccDieselFWDTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Mazda CX-3

2.0i

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0

  • Fastest top speed
    208 km/h
    129 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    330 Nm
    243 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    120 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,109 km
    689 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Mazda CX-3 2.0i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Lightest
    1,235 kg
    2,723 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    91 kW/t
    8.2 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0MazdaCX-32.0i
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
330Nm243lb-ft
204Nm150lb-ft
Curb weight
1,430kg3,153lb
1,235kg2,723lb
Gross weight
2,030kg4,475lb
1,860kg4,101lb
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
84.0s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph
Calculated
75.0s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
56.3s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
165Nm/t111lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,109km689mi
Calculated
688km427mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,275mm168in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,765mm69in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,535mm60in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,570mm101in
Front track
1,585mm62in
1,523mm60in
Rear track
1,587mm62in
1,521mm60in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
155mm6in
Trunk volume
450L
350L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
1,260L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
44L
CO2 emissions
120g/km
150g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0Mazda CX-3 2.0iPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-3 2.0i: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.04,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
MazdaCX-32.0i6,000 rpm2,800 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0MazdaCX-32.0i
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
56.3 s
-
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
150 hp
112 kW
MazdaCX-32.0i
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
MazdaCX-32.0i
204 Nm
150 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
MazdaCX-32.0i
1,235 kg
2,723 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
208 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-32.0i
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.08.8 s
MazdaCX-32.0i8.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-3 2.0i and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-32.0i
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 and Mazda CX-3 2.0i: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
MazdaCX-32.0i
121 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
1,109 km
689 mi
MazdaCX-32.0i
688 km
427 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
208 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-32.0i
150 hp
112 kW
8.7 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
MazdaCX-32.0i
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-32.0i
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
8.8 s
MazdaCX-32.0i
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-32.0i
121 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0MazdaCX-32.0i
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
204 Nm
150 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.7 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
1,235 kg
2,723 lb
Fuel consumption
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Range score
1,109 km
689 mi
688 km
427 mi
CO2 score
120 g/km
150 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
121 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0Mazda CX-3 2.0i
Consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.05 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.96 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used690 L182 US gal152 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,208 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0

  • Has 126 Nm more
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 421 km (262 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 30 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-3 2.0i

  • Is 195 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0
Mazda CX-3 2.0i
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper D 2.0
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
2.0i
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Cooper D 2.0
C 1.5
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
2.0i
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Cooper D 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
2.0i
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Cooper D 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.0i
1.4 TFSI COD
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsAUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
Cooper D 2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
2.0i
1.4 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI
2.0i
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
Cooper D 2.0
1.5 TSI EVO
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsSeatArona1.5 TSI EVO
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 vs Mazda CX-3 2.0i - car comparison - FastVsFaster