Porsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023 3.0 V6vsMaserati Grecale Modena 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Grecale
Modena 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6
- Fastest top speed248 km/h154 mph
- Most powerful353 hp263 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Largest trunk772 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Lightest1,895 kg4,178 lb
- Best power-to-weight174 hp/t130 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range688 km428 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 353hp263kW | 330hp246kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Gross weight | 2,835kg6,250lb | - |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.5s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 64.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s | 21.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 620km385mi Calculated | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,930mm194in | 4,847mm191in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 2,163mm85in |
| Height | 1,698mm67in | 1,667mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,901mm114in |
| Front track | 1,676mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,653mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 193mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 772L | 535L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,708L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 5,400-6,400 rpm | 1,450-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 5,750 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 21.5 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 353 hp 263 kW |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 330 hp 246 kW |
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 has 23 hp more than Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0 and Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 6.0 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 5.3 s |
Although Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 has more power, Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0 and Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0 and Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 620 km 385 mi |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 688 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 353 hp 263 kW | 6.0 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.3 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 353 hp 263 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 620 km 385 mi | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 772 L 27.3 cu ft | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 | Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 237 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 68 km (42 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























