AUDI Q8 (4M) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) · Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6vsMaserati Grecale Modena 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Grecale
Modena 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best estimated range746 km463 mi
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Lightest1,895 kg4,178 lb
- Best power-to-weight174 hp/t130 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 330hp246kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Gross weight | 2,830kg6,239lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 64.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.9s Calculated | 21.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 746km463mi Calculated | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,992mm197in | 4,847mm191in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | 2,163mm85in |
| Height | 1,697mm67in | 1,667mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,998mm118in | 2,901mm114in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | - |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 535L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6: Power / Torque
- Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 5,200-6,400 rpm | 1,370-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 5,750 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.9 s | 21.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 330 hp 246 kW |
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6 has 10 hp more than Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0 and AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 2,100 kg 4,630 lb |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 5.6 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 5.3 s |
Although AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6 has more power, Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0 and AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0 and AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 746 km 463 mi |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 688 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.3 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,100 kg 4,630 lb | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 746 km 463 mi | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6 | Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 57 km (36 mi) more estimated range
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























