Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 AMG GLB 35vsMaserati Grecale Modena 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Grecale
Modena 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLB 35
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Best power-to-weight175 hp/t131 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Most powerful330 hp246 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range688 km428 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 | MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 330hp246kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Gross weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 64.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.5s Calculated | 21.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 175hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 638km397mi Calculated | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,650mm183in | 4,847mm191in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 2,163mm85in |
| Height | 1,665mm66in | 1,667mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,829mm111in | 2,901mm114in |
| Front track | 1,615mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,593mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 535L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,805L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLB 35: Power / Torque
- Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 | 6,100 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 5,750 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 | MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.5 s | 21.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 | 306 hp 228 kW |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 330 hp 246 kW |
Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0 has 24 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLB 35.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLB 35 and Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 | 5.5 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLB 35: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 | 638 km 397 mi |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 688 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.3 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLB 35 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35 | MaseratiGrecaleModena 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 638 km 397 mi | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLB 35 | Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLB 35
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Maserati Grecale Modena 2.0
- Has 24 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 50 km (31 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























