Maserati GranTurismo II
Car comparison
Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6vsXPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonXPENG G6
Performance 87.5 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed302 km/h188 mph
- Most powerful496 hp370 kW
- Lightest1,795 kg3,957 lb
- Best power-to-weight276 hp/t206 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score0/100
XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Largest trunk571 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 496hp370kW | 487hp363kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,795kg3,957lb | 2,095kg4,619lb |
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.0s99% target: 299 km/h / 186 mph Calculated | 39.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.0s | 20.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 276hp/t206kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 334Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated | 315Nm/t211lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,992cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,959mm195in | 4,753mm187in |
| Width | 1,957mm77in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,353mm53in | 1,650mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,929mm115in | 2,890mm114in |
| Front track | 1,647mm65in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,660mm65in | 1,650mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 571L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,374L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.0 s | 20.9 s |
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 119 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | 496 hp 370 kW |
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6 has 9 hp more than XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh and Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb |
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 2,095 kg 4,619 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | 3.9 s |
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | 496 hp 370 kW | 3.9 s | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 496 hp 370 kW | 487 hp 363 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb | 2,095 kg 4,619 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 571 L 20.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 300 kg lighter
- Has 87 km/h (54 mph) higher top speed
- Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 261 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























