Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6vsMaserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Ghibli III (M157)
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful350 hp261 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Best power-to-weight198 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score72/100
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions207 g/km
- Best estimated range899 km559 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 350hp261kW | 330hp246kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 263 km/h 163 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 58.5s99% target: 260 km/h / 162 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.7s | 17.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 198hp/t147kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 662km411mi Calculated | 899km559mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,953cc180cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,971mm196in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,945mm77in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,461mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,998mm118in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,653mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 243g/km | 207g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,800-4,750 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 5,000 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.7 s | 17.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 263 km/h 163 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 178 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 350 hp 261 kW |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 330 hp 246 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 has 20 hp more than Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 263 km/h 163 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 4.9 s |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 5.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 and Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 198 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 662 km 411 mi |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 899 km 559 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.6 s | 263 km/h 163 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 198 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 350 hp 261 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 263 km/h 163 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 662 km 411 mi | 899 km 559 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 243 g/km | 207 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 198 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 | Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 237 km (147 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
- Emits 36 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























