Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6vsJaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

Polestar 3.0 T6

350 hp2953 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2014-2015
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

3.0 V6

340 hp2995 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6

  • Lightest
    1,710 kg
    3,770 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    199 hp/t
    148 kW/t
    5.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    198 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    892 km
    554 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    350 hp
    261 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    72/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
Power
350hp261kW
340hp254kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,710kg3,770lb
Gross weight-
2,330kg5,137lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
53.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
5.4s
0-200 km/h
17.7s
16.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
5.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.1s
Calculated
13.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
198hp/t147kW/t90hp/1000 lb
Calculated
199hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton
Calculated
263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
662km411mi
Calculated
892km554mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,953cc180cu in
2,995cc183cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,578mm62in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,575mm62in
1,594mm63in
Ground clearance
124mm5in
116mm5in
Trunk volume
380L
505L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
74L
CO2 emissions
243g/km
198g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T65,700 rpm2,800-4,750 rpm6,500 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V66,500 rpm4,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
5.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
5.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.7 s
16.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
11.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.1 s
13.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
176 km/h
109 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
350 hp
261 kW
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
340 hp
254 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
1,710 kg
3,770 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 and Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
198 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
199 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
662 km
411 mi
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
892 km
554 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
350 hp
261 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
340 hp
254 kW
5.4 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
4.9 s
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
5.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
198 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
199 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
Power
350 hp
261 kW
340 hp
254 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
Fuel consumption
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
662 km
411 mi
892 km
554 mi
CO2 score
243 g/km
198 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
198 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
199 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6
Consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.85 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.73 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,678 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6

  • Is 60 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 230 km (143 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 125 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 45 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II Polestar 3.0 T6
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 vs Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster