Maserati Ghibli I (AM115)
Car comparison
Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8vsMaserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Shamal
3.2 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful335 hp250 kW
- Highest torque461 Nm340 lb-ft
- Largest trunk680 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
- Lightest1,417 kg3,124 lb
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range696 km432 mi
- Best economy score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 335hp250kW | 326hp243kW |
| Torque | 461Nm340lb-ft | 436Nm322lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,651kg3,640lb | 1,417kg3,124lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.2s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 75.5s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.2s Calculated | 17.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 279Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 637km396mi Calculated | 696km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,930cc301cu in | 3,217cc196cu in |
| Length | 4,690mm185in | 4,100mm161in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,160mm46in | 1,300mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,440mm57in | 1,512mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,420mm56in | 1,550mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 680L | 420L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.2 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 335 hp 250 kW |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW |
Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8 has 9 hp more than Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V and Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 461 Nm 340 lb-ft |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 436 Nm 322 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 1,651 kg 3,640 lb |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 1,417 kg 3,124 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 5.3 s |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 5.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V and Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8: 4.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 637 km 396 mi |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 696 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 335 hp 250 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 |
| 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 335 hp 250 kW | 326 hp 243 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 461 Nm 340 lb-ft | 436 Nm 322 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,651 kg 3,640 lb | 1,417 kg 3,124 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 637 km 396 mi | 696 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 680 L 24.0 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8 | Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.47 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.22 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,121 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 260 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
- Is 234 kg lighter
- Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 59 km (36 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























