Maserati 3200 GT
Car comparison
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32VvsTVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTVR Cerbera
4.5 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Most powerful426 hp318 kW
- Highest torque515 Nm380 lb-ft
- Lightest1,100 kg2,425 lb
- Best power-to-weight387 hp/t289 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption20.0 L/100 km11.8 mpg US14.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score81/100
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range600 km373 mi
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 370hp276kW | 426hp318kW |
| Torque | 491Nm362lb-ft | 515Nm380lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,100kg2,425lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 37.8s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.6L/100 km10mpg US12.0mpg UK | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 387hp/t289kW/t176hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 468Nm/t313lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 600km373mi Calculated | 433km269mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,217cc196cu in | 4,475cc273cu in |
| Length | 4,510mm178in | 4,280mm169in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,310mm52in | 1,220mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,565mm101in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,465mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,538mm61in | 1,470mm58in |
| Trunk volume | - | 390L |
| Max trunk volume | 220L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: Power / Torque
- TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 6,250 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 6,750 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 12.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 9.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 197 km/h 123 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 426 hp 318 kW |
TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8 has 56 hp more than Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V and TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8: 56 hp (42 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 515 Nm 380 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 257 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 5.1 s |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8 and Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 387 hp/t 289 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 600 km 373 mi |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 433 km 269 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 426 hp 318 kW | 3.9 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
| 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 |
| 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||
TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 387 hp/t 289 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 370 hp 276 kW | 426 hp 318 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft | 515 Nm 380 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 600 km 373 mi | 433 km 269 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 387 hp/t 289 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.25 LC100 km | 26.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,938 LC/year | 3,938 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Has 33 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Has 167 km (104 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8
- Has 56 hp more
- Has 24 Nm more
- Is 490 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 155 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 170 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























